Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
658 N.W.2d 580 (2003)
Harvey CHRISTENSEN, Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
MILBANK INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. C3-01-2078.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 3, 2003.
Robert E. Kuderer, Teresa M. Thompson, Johnson & Condon, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.
John H. Scherer, Rajkowski Hansmeier Ltd., St. Cloud, MN, for Respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
ANDERSON, Russell A., Justice.
In this case, we are asked to interpret the scope of the initial permission rule which provides that when a named insured initially gives another permission to use a vehicle,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Blatz; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Page.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Larson v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Haarstad v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.