Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1984No. 9364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

The State of Hawaii appeals from an order of the family court dismissing its petition for waiver of family court jurisdiction over Appellee John Doe. We are called upon to decide whether the State may appeal such a dismissal under the circumstances of this case, and whether a juvenile is entitled to a probable cause hearing before the State may successfully seek waiver pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 571-22(c) (Supp. 1983). For the reasons discussed below, we hold that the State may not appeal such a decision. However, relying on our power to grant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. A Juvenile v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. ShintakuHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. TownHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. AmesHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. JohnsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Kaneshiro v. HuddyHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API