Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Campbell

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2005No. 24430PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that (1) the term “interested person” as defined in Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 560:1-201 (Supp.2003) does not include a party interested solely in challenging a closure order in a probate proceeding; 1 (2) a common law presumption of judicial openness accompanies probate proceedings, which may be overcome only upon a showing of strong countervailing reasons that outweigh the public’s presumptive right of access to court proceedings and records; (3) any person, including the media, is entitled to ehal- lenge petitions to close probate proceedings…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hamilton Ex Rel. Lethem v. LethemHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. RapozoHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Oahu Publications Inc. v. Ahn.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re the Estate of DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Oahu Publications, Inc. v. Takase.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API