Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kaneshiro v. Huddy

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1996No. 19863PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner State of Hawai'i sought a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge (hereinafter “Respondent Judge”) in State v. Graham, Cr. No. 94-1048 (1st Cir. Haw. heard May 15, 1996) (granting motion to exclude testimony of state’s expert Vincent Di Maio or, in the alternative, to continue trial week), to (1) vacate his oral ruling *190granting Defendant-Respondent Garreth A. Graham’s motion to exclude the testimony of the State’s proposed expert, Dr. Vincent Di Malo, and (2) grant an emergency stay of the proceedings in Graham’s criminal trial. On May 21,1996, we issued an order (1) requesting…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gannett Pacific Corp. v. RichardsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. MontalboHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KealaikiHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API