Legal Opinion

Attorney-General Ex Rel. Knapp v. Littlefield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 6, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petition, for a writ of mandamus against the defendants as the selectmen of Danbury praying that they be commanded to establish boundaries for a village district in Danbury under chapter 53 of the Public Statutes.

Read the full summary

Petition, for a writ of mandamus against the defendants as the selectmen of Danbury praying that they be commanded to establish boundaries for a village district in Danbury under chapter 53 of the Public Statutes. The case was referred to a master who found the following facts: The relators sometime previous to April 16, 1915, presented a petition to the selectmen for the laying out of a village district, and after their report thereon, at a legal meeting of the voters living in the proposed district held on the above date, “the proposition” was defeated. In May, 1915, the relators filed…

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

It is claimed by the defendants that at the meeting ■of the citizens resident in the proposed district held in April, 1915, the vote against “the proposition” amounts to a judgment and is .a bar to any action by the selectmen upon the last petition. The .argument is that the petitioners, having failed in getting an affirmative vote for the establishment of the district in the first instance, ■are bound by that vote, and cannot renew the application and have a second layout by the selectmen submitted to the voters of the proposed district. The statute under which these proceedings were brought…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boody v. WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  2. Doody v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Dinsmore v. Mayor of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  4. Manchester v. FurnaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
  5. Grafton County Electric Light & Power Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cloutier v. State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  2. Chasan v. Village District of EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  5. Baker v. Hudson School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API