Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 7, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

This proceeding is designed to review the action of the insurance commissioner in refusing to renew the licenses of certain foreign insurance companies to do business in this state. The controversy relates to automobile public liability insurance, and the plaintiffs’ conduct in relation thereto.

The statute under which the commissioner acted reads: “If . . . the commissioner is satisfied that the company has the requisite capital and assets and is a safe, reliable company, entitled to confidence, he shall grant a license to it . . . ; and . . . such license may be renewed so long as the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CohenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
  2. Grafton County Electric Light & Power Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  3. Broderick v. HuntSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  4. Hanover Precinct v. AtkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  5. Attorney-General Ex Rel. Knapp v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. State Board of InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hampton National Bank v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Musgrove a v. Winthrop Parker A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  4. Union Fidelity Life Insurance v. WhalandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API