Legal Opinion

Cloutier v. State Milk Control Board

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 6, 1942No. 3377PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

I. As a procedural issue, the defendant advances the claim that the plaintiffs’ only right to attack the order of the board is by appeal as provided by statute (It. L., c. 414), the last section of the chapter (s. 22) barring the maintenance of any proceeding in any court other than the appeal, to “set aside, enjoin the enforcement of, or otherwise review or impeach any order of the commission, except as otherwise specially provided.” The milk control act (R. L., c. 196, s. 16) brings appeals from the orders of the board established by it within the scope of the chapter (c. 414) above cited.

It…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boody v. WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  2. Woolf v. FullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. H. P. Welch Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. State v. PailleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Le Blanc v. Democratic State Central CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. O'NEIL v. ThomsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. Melton v. Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API