Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Level Export Corp. & Wolz, Aiken & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1953PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Incidental to a commercial transaction between the parties to this proceeding, there has emerged the question, now decisive in this litigation, whether each of the two contracts, which fixed the obligations of the parties, validly incorporated an agreement that “ Any controversy arising under, or in relation to, this contract, shall be settled by arbitration.”
*84As to facts: The petitioner-respondent, Level Export Corporation, to which reference will be made as the buyer, is engaged in the purchase and export of a variety of commodities including textiles. On January 22 and February 14, 1951,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Matter of Lehman v. OstrovskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In re the Arbitration between General Electric Co. & United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, C.I.O.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Awuah v. Coverall North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Mohamad S. Elahi, Kokab Moarefi Elahi and Maryam ElahiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Weddell v. H2O, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.