Legal Opinion
Binkley v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 1993No. B069234PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FUKUTO, J.
Appellants, the City of Long Beach (hereafter the City), and James C. Hankla, City Manager of the City of Long Beach (hereafter Hankla), appeal from the judgment of the superior court granting a peremptory writ of mandamus in favor of respondent, Lawrence L. Binkley, the embattled Chief of Police for the City of Long Beach. The writ set aside appellants’ directive of March 2, 1992, confirming an earlier decision by Hankla to remove Binkley from the position of chief of police effective February 14, 1992, and ordered appellants to grant respondent a new administrative appeal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- California Teachers Assn. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Hill v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Upland Police Officers Ass'n v. City of UplandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.