Legal Opinion

People v. Sexton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1999No. Docket 177061PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holbrook, Jr., J.

This case is before us following remand from the Supreme Court. Originally, we held that pursuant to the then recently decided case of People v Bender, 452 Mich 594; 551 NW2d 71 (1996), two ’ statements made by defendant had to be suppressed because they were made after the police failed to inform defendant that counsel had been retained to represent him. People v Sexton, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued December 20, 1996 (Docket No. 177061). Subsequently, our Supreme Court held that the decision in Bender was only to be given prospective…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. WellsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. WaltersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. People v. SextonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API