Dawn v. Stern Equipment Co.

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellee sued for the value of goods sold and delivered, and after trial by jury obtained judgment for $2,500. Appellant advances three reasons why the judgment should be reversed.

Appellant first says the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. The goods — restaurant equipment — were delivered over a period of time without an agreed price, the understanding being that when all equipment was delivered a bill would be submitted. When the bill was submitted the parties violently disagreed as to its reasonableness. Appellant testified that the date of the last…