Legal Opinion
Richter v. Analex Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 4, 1996No. Civil Action 95-1230 (PLF)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Analex D.C. was a District of Columbia corporation for which plaintiff, Paul S. Richter, served as counsel from 1982 until 1989. In 1986, Analex D.C. paid large bonuses to two of its former officials and in 1987 and 1988, it negotiated consulting agreements with them. Analex D.C. “passed through” the costs of these bonuses and consulting agreements to NASA with which it had an aerospace contract. As a result of these activities, Analex D.C. incurred both criminal and civil liabilities, pleading guilty in 1994 to one count of submitting a false claim. On…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- New Hampshire Insurance v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Bederson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lannan Found. v. GingoldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.