Code v. Utah Department of Health
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 We have determined that “[t]he facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record!,] and the deci-sional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument.” Utah R.App. P. 29(a)(3). We conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely.
¶ 2 Under rule 3 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, an appeal is allowed from “final orders and judgments.” Utah R.App. P. 3(a). The rules also specify that the notice of appeal must be filed “within 30 days after the date of entry of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Serrato v. Utah Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- Harris v. IES Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Foster v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Utah State Building Board v. Walsh Plumbing CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. LeatherburyUtah Supreme Court · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Code v. Utah Department of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Code v. Utah Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Code v. Utah Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006