Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Fong Wan
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 24, 1943No. Civ. 12247PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
These three actions were brought for personal injuries by Hocking, Pegnem and Campbell against Fong Wan and his two sons Richard R. Fong and Edward E. Fong. The cases were consolidated for trial and the jury returned a verdict in favor of each of the plaintiffs upon which three judgments were entered. The State Compensation Insurance Fund was allowed to intervene, it being a compensation insurance carrier for the employer of the three plaintiffs, and it also had judgment against defendants to recover compensation paid. The defendants above named appeal from the judgments entered against them.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McStay v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Long v. John Breuner Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Drillon v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Harper v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bush v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Armenta v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Lozano v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- United States of America, and Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Isaac MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.