Legal Opinion
Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. United Control Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1978No. Nos. 76-2968 and 76-2969PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
The question on this appeal is whether the district court erred in partially granting defendants’ motion for relief from a judgment granting plaintiff a permanent injunction.
Broadly, the facts are these: In 1967, plaintiff, Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, commenced this action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington against defendants United Control Corporation and UC Liquidating Corporation for an injunction and damages resulting from the infringement of its three patents numbered 3,043,540 (the “540 patent”), 3,112,905 (the “905 patent”), and 3,327,972…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Wallace Clark & Co., Inc. v. Acheson Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Charles Laduke v. Alan C. Nelson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Raymond Keith Foster, Keith Mfg. Co., and Keith Sales, Co. v. Hallco Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Olof A. HallstromCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Maraziti v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Raymond Washington v. Clayton PenwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.