Legal Opinion
United States v. Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 29, 1985No. 83-4254PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of continuing litigation, begun in 1968, over the rights of various Indian Tribes to the anadromous fishery of the Columbia River and its tributaries. In the current dispute, the States of Washington and Idaho appeal from an expired preliminary injunction issued in 1983 at the request of the Tribes under the district court’s retained jurisdiction in the case. The injunction prevented the States of Oregon and Washington from enforcing certain fishing regulations against the Tribes during the fall 1983 fish runs; it also adopted the Tribes’ 1983…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Whittaker Corporation Whittaker Controls, Inc. v. Execuair Corporation Execuair Sales Corporation David ManhanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Don Kirshner, and Schumaier, Roberts & McKinsey v. Uniden Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Villafuerte v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.