Weltz v. State

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Appellants were jointly tried and convicted of the crimes of rape. 1 Judgments and commitments were entered under which appellants received sentences of three years imprisonment. In their appeal to this court, appellants contend they should be granted a new trial because of the superior court’s failure to suppress, 2 and its subsequent admission into evidence of the state’s exhibit A. 3 Appellants’ primary argument is that exhibit A was obtained by an illegal search and seizure in violation of the Alaska constitution and the Constitution of the United States of…