Legal Opinion

Erickson v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1973No. 1521, 1542PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

I

Appellants Howard Charles Erickson and Malcolm Allen Ericson were convicted in the superior court under an indictment charging them with possession of marijuana and LSD for the purpose of sale. In addition, Allen Ericson was separately convicted in the district court under a criminal complaint charging simple possession of marijuana; the misdemeanor conviction was affirmed on appeal to the superior court. 1 A claim of unlawful search and seizure provides the single basis for challenge to the validity of the convictions in this consolidated appeal.

II

On the evening of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pawloski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API