Erickson v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERWIN, Justice.
I
Appellants Howard Charles Erickson and Malcolm Allen Ericson were convicted in the superior court under an indictment charging them with possession of marijuana and LSD for the purpose of sale. In addition, Allen Ericson was separately convicted in the district court under a criminal complaint charging simple possession of marijuana; the misdemeanor conviction was affirmed on appeal to the superior court. 1 A claim of unlawful search and seizure provides the single basis for challenge to the validity of the convictions in this consolidated appeal.
II
On the evening of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Pawloski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.