Legal Opinion

Messner v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1963No. Civ. 7192PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

This is a second petition for review in this same case. This court’s review of the first petition (Messner v. Industrial Acc. Com., 4 Civil No. 7119, filed July 6, 1962) was concerned entirely with the issue of whether or not a noise-induced hearing loss was an “occupational disease” (Lab. Code, § 5412), or whether it was caused by a continuing trauma (Lab. Code, § 5411), and which statute of limitations applied.

Section 5412 of the Labor Code provides: 1 ‘ The date of injury in eases of occupational diseases is that date upon which the employee first suffered disability therefrom and either…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. England v. Hospital of the Good SamaritanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. United Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Voorhis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Messina v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API