Legal Opinion
Clay v. Tryk
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1986No. A029922PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, J.
Appellant Everett Clay appeals from a judgment denying a writ of mandamus to compel the award of welfare benefits.
Clay applied for general relief benefits on November 4, 1983. The welfare department found him eligible for some general relief, but denied him housing and utility benefits pursuant to Lake County General Relief Regulation section III, subdivision B, subsection 5. The regulation refuses housing benefits to persons in shared housing arrangements where not all members of the household are entitled to general relief. The welfare department upheld the initial decision…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Leslie Salt Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mendly v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Nelson v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Whitfield v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Watkins v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Oberlander v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.