Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Earle

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided September 15, 1893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action by James H. Bodgers and others against Ferdinand P. Earle for rescission of certain contracts, and for other relief. Plaintiff moves to continue an injunction granted pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The defendant, who is the lessee from the Lorillard estate of the property known as “Earle’s Hotel,” made an underlease to the plaintiffs for a term commencing February, 1893, and ending May 1, 1899, when the first term of the defendant’s lease from the Lorillards will expire. The plaintiffs, at the same time, purchased certain furniture and fixtures in the hotel for §25,000, in addition to the rental agreed to be paid, which is §24,000 a year; and the defendant, at the expiration of the term, is to transfer the ground lease to the plaintiffs, so that they may procure the renewal thereof from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vose v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Popfinger v. . YutteNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. In re New York, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Shepard v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Becker v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DeVita v. PianisaniAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
  2. Bien v. BixbyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  3. Roedmann v. HertelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  4. Woods v. GarcewichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. Richards v. LittellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API