Belding Bros. & Co. v. Blum
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal ■ from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Summary proceedings by Belding Bros. & Co. against Nathan V. Blum to dispossess for nonpayment of rent. From an adverse final order, the landlords appeal. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.
The appellants, having acquired a lease of the building 455 and 457 Broadway for a term of two years from February 1, 1901, sublet a portion of the premises to the respondent for a similar term, with the provision in the sublease to the effect that, if appellants secured “a new and further lease of the demised premises for a further term, at the end of the term of- their original lease, they would renew the sublease to Blum [respondent] for a like term at a rental of $3,250 per annum. The subtenant, Blum, was in occupancy of the premises in question during the term of his sublease, and duly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dodds v. . HakesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Durant Land Improvement Co. v. East River Electric Light Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1889
- Natkins v. WettererAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Sheldon v. TesteraAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
- Schlaich v. BlumNew York Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.