Legal Opinion
Gladrow v. Weisz
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1965No. 22536PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from an order requiring the production of a page or pages of a certain notebook incident to cross-examination of a witness in a pending proceeding before a board of patent interferences of the United States Patent Office. 1
The question to be determined by the board is that of “priority of invention.” 35 U.S.C.A. § 135(a). The appellant Gladrow 2 was the first party to file application for the patent and is presumptively the inventor. He is denominated the senior party in the interference proceeding. The other applicant, appellee Weisz, is called the junior…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Korman v. NobileDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1960
- United States v. Frances VivianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Okun v. KastnerDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1941
3Cited by32 opinions
- Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. BraddickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- In Re Subpoena Served on the California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation, and California Public Utilities Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant- and California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gideon Ariel and Irving I. Dardik, U.S. Olympic Committee v. Arthur Jones, an Individual and D/B/A Nautilus Sports/medical IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- In Re Natta, Movant in the United States Patent Office Before the Examiner of Interferences, Interference No. 89634. Hogan v. Zletz v. Baxter v. Natta E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.