Legal Opinion
Okun v. Kastner
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided February 19, 1941No. 5010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTIGAN, District Judge.
Objection has been made to the following motion filed under Rule 34 of the Rules of Civil Procedure of the District Court of the United States, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c:
“The senior party, William Kastner, moves the Court for an order requiring Herbert B. Barlow, attorney for the party Okun, to produce the following document for insertion into the record:
“Letter on letterhead of Atlas Flow Surfacing Machinery Corp., dated April 28, 1939, addressed to H. Barlow and signed by N. N. Okun. Said document has been offered in evidence as Exhibí*- E in behalf of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Egan v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Gladrow v. WeiszCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Giulio Natta, Piero Pino, Giorgia Mazzanti and Montecatini Societa Generale Per L'IndustrIa Mineraria E Chimica (Now Montecatini Edison, s.p.a.) v. John Paul Hogan, Robert L. Banks and Phillips Petroleum Company, John Paul Hogan, Robert L. Banks and Phillips Petroleum Company v. Giulio Natta, Piero Pino, Giorgia Mazzanti and Montecatini Societa Generale Per L'IndustrIa Mineraria E Chimica (Now Montecatini Edison, s.p.a.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968