Legal Opinion

In Re Subpoena Served on the California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation, and California Public Utilities Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant- and California Public Utilities Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1987No. 86-1562PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

813 F.2d 1473

55 USLW 2589, 7 Fed.R.Serv.3d 581

In re SUBPOENA SERVED on the CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a California

corporation, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company,

a California corporation, Plaintiffs,

and

California Public Utilities Commission, Respondent-Appellee,

v.

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a California

corporation; San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a

California corporation, Plaintiffs,

v.

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania

corporation, Defendant- Appellant,

and

California…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Miscellaneous Docket 1 v. Miscellaneous Docket 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Admiral Insurance Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Richard O. Bertoli Podvey, Sachs, Meanor, Catenacci, Hildner & Cocoziello, Court-Appointed Standby Counsel for Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino VillacrusisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API