Legal Opinion

State v. Mann

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 19, 2019No. 29/19PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Christopher Mann, No. 29, September Term, 2019 INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – PREJUDICE PRONG – PURPORTED ALIBI WITNESSES – Court of Appeals held that petitioner for postconviction relief failed to establish that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by not requesting alibi jury instruction, as petitioner had failed to satisfy prejudice prong of test set forth in Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668

(1984), i.e., burden to prove that there was reasonable probability, or substantial or significant possibility, that jury would have acquitted him…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Weaver v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. State v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API