Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 2017No. 16–240PublishedCited by 562 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

During petitioner's trial on state criminal charges, the courtroom was occupied by potential jurors and closed to the public for two days of the jury selection process. Defense counsel neither objected to the closure at trial nor raised the issue on direct review. And the case comes to the Court on the assumption that, in failing to object, defense counsel provided ineffective assistance.

In the direct review context, the underlying constitutional violation-the courtroom closure-has been treated by this Court as a structural error, i.e., an error entitling the defendant to automatic reversal…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by562 opinions

  1. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Flores RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. United States v. Michael GaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Matthew JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. Miller, Arthur Franklin Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018

557 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API