Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 13, 2020No. 57/19PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shawn Albert Franklin v. State of Maryland, No. 57, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Biran, J. WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS – INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – PERFORMANCE OF COUNSEL – MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE UNDER MD. RULE 4-345(e) – REQUEST FOR HEARING DURING FIVE-YEAR PERIOD FOR REVIEW OF RULE 4-345(e) MOTION – “NO ACTION” NOTATION BY SENTENCING COURT – The Court of Appeals held that it was clear error to find that a sentencing court’s notation of “no action” on a defendant’s motion for modification of sentence and proposed order, approximately three weeks after the filing of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API