Franklin v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Shawn Albert Franklin v. State of Maryland, No. 57, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Biran, J. WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS – INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – PERFORMANCE OF COUNSEL – MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE UNDER MD. RULE 4-345(e) – REQUEST FOR HEARING DURING FIVE-YEAR PERIOD FOR REVIEW OF RULE 4-345(e) MOTION – “NO ACTION” NOTATION BY SENTENCING COURT – The Court of Appeals held that it was clear error to find that a sentencing court’s notation of “no action” on a defendant’s motion for modification of sentence and proposed order, approximately three weeks after the filing of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Butler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.