Legal Opinion

State v. Day

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 10, 2020No. 67/19PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. James Kareen Day, No. 67, September Term, 2019 INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE – MARYLAND RULE 4-345(e) – REMAND – MARYLAND RULE 8-604(d) – Court of Appeals concluded that case potentially presented issue of whether petitioner for postconviction relief seeking right to file belated motion for modification of sentence pursuant to Maryland Rule 4-345(e) based on ineffective assistance of counsel must establish that he or she timely requested that trial counsel file such motion. As such, Court of Appeals determined that case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. State v. FlansburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. State v. SchlickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API