Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2008No. 46275PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Saitta, J.:

The United States District Court for the District of Nevada has certified, under NRAP 5, the following question to this court: “[wjhether, under Nevada law, an additional insured endorsement provides coverage for an injury caused by the sole independent negligence of the additional insured?” We answer the question in the affirmative and conclude that, unless the contrary intent is demonstrated by specific language excluding or limiting coverage for injuries caused by the additional insured’s independent negligent acts, there is coverage.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Merchants Insurance Co. of New Hampshire, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Swift Energy Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Acceptance Insurance v. Syufy EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. National Union Fire Insurance v. Reno's Executive Air, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Scott E. McIntosh and Steven R. McIntosh v. Scottsdale Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Philip Morris, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Zurich American Insurance v. Coeur Rochester, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2010
  3. Michael Lancaster v. Ferrell Paving, Inc. v. Everest Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  4. Walker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2017
  5. In re Las Vegas Monorail Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API