Legal Opinion

Graybeal v. Press-Telegram Publishing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1936No. Civ. 10797PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after the trial court (1) sustained a demurrer to counts 1, 2 and 4 of appellant’s amended complaint without leave to amend, and (2) granted a motion for nonsuit as to counts 3 and 5 of the amended complaint.

Appellant has failed in his opening brief to present each point separately under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented and the point to be made without any other matter appearing thereon. (Rule VIII, sec. 2, p. 10, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Battson v. KirkpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Bernstein v. Congregation Anshi SfartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Ferslew v. AndersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Del Real v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Chichester v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Driscoll v. ShippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API