Legal Opinion

Ferslew v. Andersen

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1936No. Civ. No. 10780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after a trial before a court without a jury.

Appellant has not observed the provision of Rule VIII, section 2, of this court, which requires that the question involved on appeal in a civil action be set forth on the first page of the opening brief without any other matter appearing thereon. (Rule VIII, sec. 2, p. 10, Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California.)

In the instant case there is a total absence of a compliance with the foregoing rule. This court cannot assume the task…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. Congregation Anshi SfartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Graybeal v. Press-Telegram Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Dixon v. Columbia Glass Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API