Legal Opinion
Driscoll v. Shipp
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 1937No. Civ. No. 11445; Civ. No. 11446PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrail, P. J.
—These are companion eases. They come before the court at this time on the motions of the defendants *370to dismiss the appeals for failure of plaintiffs (appellants) to comply with rule VIII of Rules for the Supreme Court and District Court of Appeal and other grounds.
In the trial court judgment was entered in both cases in favor of the defendants upon verdict of a jury. Motions for new trials were denied. Thereafter plaintiffs appealed from these judgments. The appeals were heard on the merits and the contentions of the plaintiffs were resolved against them. (Driscoll v. Shipp, 13 Cal. App.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Driscoll v. ShippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Battson v. KirkpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bernstein v. Congregation Anshi SfartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Graybeal v. Press-Telegram Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hunt v. United Artists Studio Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Lowry v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942