Legal Opinion

Battson v. Kirkpatrick

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1936No. Civ. No. 10658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after a trial before a court without a jury.

*284Appellant has failed in his opening brief to present each point separately under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented and the point to be made. (See. 2, Rule VIII, of the District Court of Appeal.) Mr. Justice Conrey in Adams v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 124 Cal. App. 393 [12 Pac. (2d) 464], then Presiding Justice of the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One, in commenting upon this provision of Bule VIII,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. Congregation Anshi SfartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Graybeal v. Press-Telegram Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Driscoll v. ShippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API