Legal Opinion
Ansell Inc. v. Schmid Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 27, 1991No. Civ. 90-3581 (GEB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRETT E. BROWN, Jr., District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an antitrust action brought by Ansell Incorporated pursuant to Section 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 26, to challenge the acquisition of Allercare/NSL, Inc. by Schmid Laboratories, Inc., as viola-tive of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18. The amended complaint seeks an order of divestiture and or rescission, and such other relief as may be just and proper. Plaintiff asserts no claim for money damages. This Opinion constitutes my Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Todd v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Moore Corp. Ltd. v. Wallace Computer Services, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. Mayer Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Ansell, Inc. v. Schmid Laboratories, Inc., Allercare/ Nsl, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.