Legal Opinion

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. Mayer Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 12, 2012No. C-10-4429 EMCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*884ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Church & Dwight, Inc. (“C & D”), the maker of Trojan brand condoms, moves for summary judgment on Defendant/Counter-claimant Mayer Labs, Inc.’s (“Mayer’s”) counterclaims. Docket No. 187, 198 (redacted version). Mayer is the maker of Kimono brand condoms. The parties’ primary dispute surrounds C & D’s use of planogram1 agreements with condom retailers, whereby C & D offers a percentage rebate off its wholesale price in exchange for a retailer’s commitment…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Feitelson v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API