Anthony D. Hardnett v. Charles D. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Concurrences by Judges SCHROEDER and JONES.
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a difficult question of whether a prosecutor’s violation of a criminal defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause, as applied to California by the Due Process Clause, was of a character to warrant the grant of habeas corpus. The issue is close. The ease is as follows:
In the early hours of October 7, 1989, at the Winsor Hotel, 20 Sixth Street between Market and Mission Streets, San Francisco, a block away from this Court of Appeals and two long blocks from City Hall, Vance Outlaw…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Milton Eugene Cupit v. John P. Whitley, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Robert TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Victor Hassine v. Charles Zimmerman, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Duckett v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- James Leslie Karis v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, James Leslie Karis v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.