Legal Opinion

Anthony D. Hardnett v. Charles D. Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1994No. 93-15857PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Concurrences by Judges SCHROEDER and JONES.

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a difficult question of whether a prosecutor’s violation of a criminal defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause, as applied to California by the Due Process Clause, was of a character to warrant the grant of habeas corpus. The issue is close. The ease is as follows:

In the early hours of October 7, 1989, at the Winsor Hotel, 20 Sixth Street between Market and Mission Streets, San Francisco, a block away from this Court of Appeals and two long blocks from City Hall, Vance Outlaw…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Milton Eugene Cupit v. John P. Whitley, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Robert TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Victor Hassine v. Charles Zimmerman, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Duckett v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. James Leslie Karis v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, James Leslie Karis v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API