Legal Opinion

In Re Marquez

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. Crim. 3868PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The above-named defendant, Frank Marquez, was charged, by information containing four counts, with the crime of rape, a felony. He entered a plea of guilty to count one and applied for probation, whereupon the court ordered that proceedings as to that count be suspended and that defendant be granted probation for a period of twenty years, under condition that “the first four years of said probationary period, defendant shall serve at the county road camp. ...”

After serving one year in the county road camp, defendant sued out a writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that “any period in excess…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. De VoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. McKeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. NooneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. A-FBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959
  3. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Lubey v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API