Legal Opinion

State v. Tyler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2000No. CA 101407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant is charged with possession of cocaine that a Portland police officer discovered during an inventory of her person after he arrested her for crossing a street at other than a right angle, in violation of a city ordinance. The trial court concluded that the city could not authorize an arrest for that offense and therefore suppressed evidence of the cocaine. The city appeals, and we affirm.

We state the facts as the trial court found them, resolving any evidentiary disputes that the trial court did not expressly decide in a way that supports its ruling suppressing the evidence. See Ball…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Hood River County v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. City of Corvallis v. Pi Kappa PhiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API