Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 1, 2009No. C063182CR; A135045PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of identity theft. ORS 165.800. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered on his person during a traffic stop. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that the evidence was discovered lawfully during an inventory of defendant’s personal effects in conjunction with his arrest. Defendant contends that, because no inventory policy actually was received into evidence, the trial court erred in denying his motion. We affirm.

Washington County Sheriffs Deputy Bowman stopped a car because of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. CordovaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. HockersmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API