Legal Opinion

Roosevelt Savings Bank of City of New York v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 21, 1976No. 1 CA-CIV 2983PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

In this case a major fire loss occurred to a vacant single-family residence after mortgage foreclosure proceedings had been concluded. In an action for declaratory judgment, the Roosevelt Savings Bank of the City of New York (referred to here as “the bank”) sought to establish its right to recover fire insurance proceeds under a policy issued by State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (referred to here as “State Farm”). The trial court decided the issues adversely to the bank on cross motions for summary judgment. This appeal followed.

There is no dispute about the facts. Phillip J.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Germania Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. First National Bank v. MaxeyArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Parker v. GentryArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Dart v. Western Savings & Loan AssociationArizona Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Country Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Aaron v. FromkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. McCallister Co. v. KastellaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PeatonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Sapphire Investments v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson (In Re Sapphire Investments)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API