Legal Opinion

Aaron v. Fromkin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 1, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 99-0063PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PATTERSON, Judge.

¶ 1 Michael and Sue Fromkin (Defendants) appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment for Frank and Deborah Aaron and F & D Consulting, Inc. (Plaintiffs) on their securities fraud claim. Because the securities fraud claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, we reverse the summary judgment and grant summary judgment to Defendants. Defendants also appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of negligent misrepresentation. We affirm that decision and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Peery v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. State v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Strategic Diversity, Inc. v. Alchemix CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Rowland v. Kellogg Brown and Root, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API