Legal Opinion
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 2, 2012No. A10-2127PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case arises out of a dispute between Brown and Nobles Counties over which county is the “county of financial responsibility” for the out-of-home placement costs incurred after October 1, 2008, for a minor child named S.M. By order dated April 20, 2010, the Minnesota Department of Human Services (MDHS) held that Nobles County was responsible for S.M.’s out-of-home placement costs. Nobles County appealed to the Nobles County District Court, which reversed the MDHS decision based on its conclusion that the legislative history of MinmStat. § 256G.10 (2010) indicates that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Martin v. DicklichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Persigehl v. Ridgebrook Investments Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Jan Kuklenski v. Medtronic USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
- Jeff Persigehl and Samone Bodley, individually and on behalf of the putative classes, (A14-0027), (A14-0123) v. Ridgebrook Investments Limited Partnership, (A14-0027), (A14-0123), MNS Investors, LLP d/b/a Bar-Ett Investment Company, (A14-0027), (A14-0123), American Utility Management, Inc., (A14-0027), (A14-0123).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.