Legal Opinion
Howley v. Mellon Financial Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 31, 2010No. 08-1748PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEE, Chief Judge.
Defendants Mellon Financial Corporation (“MFC”) and various MFC-related entities appeal the district court’s order granting Howley summary judgment on his claim for benefits under MFC’s Displacement Program. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.
I
Howley was employed for many years by a subsidiary of MFC known as “Buck Consultants.” He was therefore eligible for, and participated in, MFC’s Displacement Program. That program is a welfare benefit plan subject to the requirements and protections of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Fleisher v. Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Miller v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Williams v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.