Legal Opinion

Kelly v. City of Cape Girardeau

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Springfield Court of Appeals certified this cause to us for determination. It was the unanimous opinion of that court that its opinion was in conflict with an opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appeals in the case of. Bird v. Railroad, 30 Mo. App. 365, and the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Steiglider v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co., 38 Mo. App. 511.

The action is one for damages resulting from the overflow of respondent’s property during heavy rains. The overflows are alleged to have been caused by the grading, curbing and guttering of the street in front of respondent’s dwelling by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McKee v. DoddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lampert v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. Union Railroad & Transportation Co. v. TraubeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. Shelley v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of Westfield v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1869

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. San Antonio River Authority v. Garrett BrothersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Riblet v. Ideal Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hulshof v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API