Legal Opinion

Shelley v. Ozark Pipe Line Corporation

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 25, 1931PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause was certified to this court by the Springfield Court of Appeals because of the dissenting opinion and request of Cox, P.J., on the theory that the majority opinion on the question ofres judicata is in conflict with Charles v. St. Louis M. S.E. Railroad Company, 124 Mo. App. 293, and Womach v. City of St. Joseph, 201 Mo. 467. For a full statement of the cause, see 2 S.W.2d 115. Only so much of the evidence and pleadings will be stated as we deem necessary to dispose of the issues presented.

Plaintiffs filed two cases against the defendant company. The first case is reported in 247…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Finney v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Womach v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Stodghill v. C., B. & Q. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Van Hoozier v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. Smith v. City of SedaliaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Pearson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Thompson v. HodgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API