Legal Opinion

Union Railroad & Transportation Co. v. Traube

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1875PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The agreed case shows that the present counter-claim was not an issue, and the merits of it not disposed of in the' former suit, and hence the prior judgment is no bar. (2 Phil.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The agreed case shows that the present counter-claim was not an issue, and the merits of it not disposed of in the' former suit, and hence the prior judgment is no bar. (2 Phil. Ev., 17, 18 [Cow. & Hill, notes 261] ; Id., 4; 2¥. Black, S27; 3 Wils., 304; Goodson vs. Smith, 2 Moore, 157; Seldon vs. Tutop, 6 T. R., 607 ; Thorpe vs. Cooper, 5 Bing., 129; Hadley vs. Green, 2 Tyrw., 390; Davenport vs. Hubbard 45 Yt., 200 ; 43 Yt., 410; Snider vs. Croy, 2 Johns., 227; Phillips vs. Berrick, 16 Johns., 136; Hale vs. Andrews, 6 Cow., 225; Wheeler vs. Yan Honten,-12…

1Opinion of the CourtNapton, Judge

This suit was to recover a freight bill amounting to $411.67, for transportation of certain goods from New York to St. Louis, at the 2-equest of defendant.

The answer sets up a counter-claim for $1000 damages for failing to deliver 58 tierces of rice, a portion of the cargo ordered by defendant. The reply admitted the failm-e to deliver the 58 tierces of rice; but set up a judgment recovered by Traube in the Circuit Court, U. S., against the plaintiff, for $2616; the value of said rice, and claimed the judgment which was paid was an adjudication of that matter, which barred the defendant from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Farrington v. PayneNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  3. Miller v. CovertNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of Westfield v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Wagner v. JacobySupreme Court of Missouri · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Och v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Eastland County v. DavissonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Donnell v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Hill v. CombsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Hoffmann v. Hoffmann'sSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API