Legal Opinion

Windsor Contr. Corp. v. Budny

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 9, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

93 N.J. Super. 235 (1966)

225 A.2d 596

WINDSOR CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND SHADY REST TRUCKING CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

VINCENT BUDNY AND BUDNY'S TIRE SERVICE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 24, 1966.

Decided December 9, 1966.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Edward B. Meredith argued the cause for appellants (Meredith & Meredith, attorneys).

Mr. Anton J. Hollendonner argued the cause for respondent Windsor Contracting Corp.

The opinion of the court was delivered by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  3. Crucible Steel Co. of America v. Polack Tyre & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  4. Levy v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  5. Wallace v. GarageUnited States District Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Onondaga Truck Lease Inc. v. HovellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. Ozark Financial Services v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Whitmore v. NJ Div. of Motor VehiclesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API