Heilbron v. Heinlen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action to recover damages for trespass upon real property.
It is alleged in the complaint that for more than two years last past, the plaintiffs had been seised and possessed of all that certain tract of land in the counties of Fresno and Tulare, known as the rancho Laguna de Tache, containing about forty-eight thousand acres, and for which a patent, dated March 6, 1866, was issued by the United States to Manuel Castro; that on the seventeenth day of December, 1883, the plaintiffs were engaged in constructing a fence of posts and wire along the right bank of Kings…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Holman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Pollock v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Pennybecker v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Rogers v. DuhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Reiner v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Alechoff v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RenzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.