Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Long

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1996No. 3913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this opinion, we are called upon to determine whether in a summary offense case, the trial court erred when it denied appellant’s motion to suppress evidence found on his person after he was arrested and incarcerated for defaulting on the payment of a traffic citation and for failing to post bail as a result of the default. We hold that the record supports the trial court’s denial of appellant’s suppression motion and its conclusion that the marijuana found on appellant’s person was not the result of an illegal arrest and incarceration. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ReddixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. BurnsideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValentinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. MeachumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. SeilhamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. In re J.V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API